Comparison of the effect of chewing mastic and spearmint sugar-free chewing gum on salivary flow rate and pH

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologist, Kerman, Iran

4 Resident, Department of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hyposalivation can cause many difficulties for patients like opportunistic infections such as candidiasis, mouth sores, and dysphagia as well as reduced quality of life (QOL). Methods such as using sugar-free chewing gum are recommended to treat this complication. Mastic is a natural substance and since it has various properties in addition to increasing salivary flow rate, it can reduce oral complications of patients suffering from xerostomia. In the present study, a comparison was made on the effect of chewing mastic and spearmint sugar-free chewing gum on saliva flow rate and pH.
METHODS: This was a single blind interventional clinical study carried out on 26 healthy individuals (10 men and 16 women). Simple non-probability sampling method was used to select the subjects. Initially, unstimulating saliva was collected and then all subjects were asked to chew Parafilm, mastic, and spearmint sugar-free chewing gum with a randomized order and in a 15-minute interval. Salivary flow rate was estimated by dividing the amount of the collected saliva (weight or volume) by the sample collection period (5 minutes). Saliva pH was measured by a manual pH meter. Data were analyzed using SPSS software by t-test.
RESULTS: A total of 26 volunteers (10 men and 16 women) participated in this study, with a mean age of 23.5 years. The saliva flow rate and pH after chewing mastic (the main substance in this study) were not significantly different from those after consuming the chewing gum (P > 0.050). Mastic and chewing gum increased the salivary flow rate significantly compared to Parafilm (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: The results showed that mastic and sugar-free chewing gum could increase salivary flow rate and pH. Due to the flavor and high price of sugar-free chewing gum, mastic can be recommended instead of sugar-free chewing gums.

Keywords


  1. Porter S. PLENARY ABSTRACT: Xerostomia: Prevalence, assessment, differential diagnosis and implications for quality of life. Oral Diseases 2010; 16(6): 501-2.
  2. Villa A, Wolff A, Narayana N, Dawes C, Aframian DJ, Lynge Pedersen AM, et al. World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: A systematic review of medication-induced salivary gland dysfunction. Oral Dis 2016; 22(5): 365-82.
  3. Gonzalez S, Sung H, Sepulveda D, Gonzalez M, Molina C. Oral manifestations and their treatment in Sjogren's syndrome. Oral Dis 2014; 20(2): 153-61.
  4. Pinna R, Campus G, Cumbo E, Mura I, Milia E. Xerostomia induced by radiotherapy: An overview of the physiopathology, clinical evidence, and management of the oral damage. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2015; 11: 171-88.
  5. Mauri-Obradors E, Estrugo-Devesa A, Jane-Salas E, Vinas M, Lopez-Lopez J. Oral manifestations of Diabetes Mellitus. A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2017; 22(5): e586-e594.
  6. Shinozaki S, Moriyama M, Hayashida JN, Tanaka A, Maehara T, Ieda S, et al. Close association between oral Candida species and oral mucosal disorders in patients with xerostomia. Oral Dis 2012; 18(7): 667-72.
  7. Niklander S, Veas L, Barrera C, Fuentes F, Chiappini G, Marshall M. Risk factors, hyposalivation and impact of xerostomia on oral health-related quality of life. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31: e14.
  8. Ship JA, McCutcheon JA, Spivakovsky S, Kerr AR. Safety and effectiveness of topical dry mouth products containing olive oil, betaine, and xylitol in reducing xerostomia for polypharmacy-induced dry mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34(10): 724-32.
  9. Guggenheimer J, Moore PA. Xerostomia: Etiology, recognition and treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134(1): 61-9.
  10. Samarawickrama DY. Saliva substitutes: how effective and safe are they? Oral Dis 2002; 8(4): 177-9.
  11. Ur-Rehman S, Mushtaq Z, Zahoor T, Jamil A, Murtaza MA. Xylitol: A review on bioproduction, application, health benefits, and related safety issues. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2015; 55(11): 1514-28.
  12. Karami-Nogourani M, Kowsari-Isfahan R, Hosseini-Beheshti M. The effect of chewing gum's flavor on salivary flow rate and pH. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011; 8(Suppl 1): S71-S75.
  13. Bakhtiari S, Azimi Hosseini S, Esfandiari F, Alavi K. Comparison of the effect of sugarfree orbit chewing gum & natural turpentine on salivary flow rate & pH. J Dent Sch 2007; 24(4): 423-8. [In Persian].
  14. Cotomacio C, Campos L, Simoes A, Jaguar G, Crosato EM, Abreu-Alves F. Influence of bethanechol on salivary parameters in irradiated patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2017; 22(1): e76-e83.
  15. Lopez-Pintor RM, Lopez-Pintor L, Casanas E, de Arriba L, Hernandez G. Risk factors associated with xerostomia in haemodialysis patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2017; 22(2): e185-e192.
  16. Makinen KK. Gastrointestinal Disturbances associated with the consumption of sugar alcohols with special consideration of xylitol: Scientific review and instructions for dentists and other health-care professionals. Int J Dent 2016; 2016: 5967907.
  17. Takahashi K, Fukazawa M, Motohira H, Ochiai K, Nishikawa H, Miyata T. A pilot study on antiplaque effects of mastic chewing gum in the oral cavity. J Periodontol 2003; 74(4): 501-5.
  18. Aksoy A, Duran N, Koksal F. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial effects of mastic chewing gum against Streptococcus mutans and mutans streptococci. Arch Oral Biol 2006; 51(6): 476-81.
  19. Kaufman E, Lamster IB. The diagnostic applications of saliva--a review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002; 13(2): 197-212.
  20. Cassolato SF, Turnbull RS. Xerostomia: Clinical aspects and treatment. Gerodontology 2003; 20(2): 64-77.
  21. Flink H, Tegelberg A, Lagerlof F. Influence of the time of measurement of unstimulated human whole saliva on the diagnosis of hyposalivation. Arch Oral Biol 2005; 50(6): 553-9.
  22. Yamuna Priya K, Muthu Prathibha K. Methods of collection of saliva - A Review. Int J Oral Health Dent 2017; 3(3): 149-53.
  23. Fox PC, Busch KA, Baum BJ. Subjective reports of xerostomia and objective measures of salivary gland performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115(4): 581-4.
  24. Fox PC. Differentiation of dry mouth etiology. Adv Dent Res 1996; 10(1): 13-6.
  25. Sreebny L, Zhu WX. Whole saliva and the diagnosis of Sjogren's syndrome: An evaluation of patients who complain of dry mouth and dry eyes. Part 1: Screening tests. Gerodontology 1996; 13(1): 35-43.
  26. Zaura E, Nicu EA, Krom BP, Keijser BJ. Acquiring and maintaining a normal oral microbiome: current perspective. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2014; 4: 85.
  27. Ghapanchi J, Rezazadeh F, Fakhraee E, Zamani A. Prevalence of xerostomia in patients referred to Shiraz Dental School, Shiraz, Iran during 2006-2013. Iran J Public Health 2016; 45(12): 1665-6.
  28. Biria M, Eslami G, Taghipour E, Akbarzadeh BA. Effects of three mastic gums on the number of mutans Streptococci, Lactobacilli and PH of the Saliva. J Dent (Tehran) 2014; 11(6): 672-9.
  29. Soderling E, ElSalhy M, Honkala E, Fontana M, Flannagan S, Eckert G, et al. Effects of short-term xylitol gum chewing on the oral microbiome. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19(2): 237-44.
  30. Mercadante V, Al HA, Lodi G, Porter S, Fedele S. Interventions for the management of radiotherapy-induced xerostomia and hyposalivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol 2017; 66: 64-74.
  31. Sakagami H, Kishino K, Kobayashi M, Hashimoto K, Iida S, Shimetani A, et al. Selective antibacterial and apoptosis-modulating activities of mastic. In Vivo 2009; 23(2): 215-23.