The use of re-surgery in the treatment of teeth with severe sensitivity in the buccal mucous ‎membrane: A case report with 75 months follow-up

Document Type: Case Report(s)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Oral and ‎Dental Diseases Research Center AND Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research ‎‎Center, ‎Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran‎

2 Assistant Professor, Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Neuroscience Research Center, ‎Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Oral ‎and Dental Diseases Research Center AND Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research ‎‎Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz ‎University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

5 Assistant Professor, Persian Gulf Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Hormozgan University ‎of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

6 MSc Student, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical ‎Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A periapical endodontic surgery is an alternative treatment when teeth are not responding to conventional treatment and endodontic re-treatment.CASE REPORT: The following case report presents a clinical case of maxillary right and left central incisors with unsatisfying endodontic surgery and severe sensitivity in the buccal mucous membrane. Radiographic examination revealed several fragments of amalgam as root-end filling material, surrounded by a periapical radiolucent area. The chosen treatment plan was to perform endodontic retreatment. Symptoms persisted in spite of the gutta-percha removal and calcium hydroxide intracanal medication. Hence, periradicular re-surgery was performed. However, deep tissue penetrated amalgam particles were difficult to explore and could not be removed completely. The root-end filling was done with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and the lesion was subjected to histologic analyses. The treatment was successful due to the absence of painful symptoms and due to periapical bone repair after 75 months follow-up.CONCLUSION: MTA can be used successfully in the situations with failed previous periradicular surgery with amalgam.

Keywords


  1. Pedroche LO, Barbieri N, Fagundes Tomazinho FS, Ulbrich LM, Leonardi DP. Apicoectomy after conventional endodontic treatment failure: Case report. RSBO 2013; 10(2): 182-7.
  2. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Schwartz-Arad D, Fuss Z. Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique. J Endod 2006; 32(5): 412-6.
  3. Johnson BR. Considerations in the selection of a root-end filling material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87(4): 398-404.
  4. Testori T, Capelli M, Milani S, Weinstein RL. Success and failure in periradicular surgery: a longitudinal retrospective analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87(4): 493-8.
  5. Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR. Root-end filling materials: rationale and tissue response. Endod Topics 2005; 11(1): 114-30.
  6. Soundappan S, Sundaramurthy JL, Raghu S, Natanasabapathy V. Biodentine versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate versus Intermediate Restorative Material for Retrograde Root End Filling: An Invitro Study. J Dent (Tehran) 2014; 11(2): 143-9.
  7. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review--part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod 2010; 36(2): 190-202.
  8. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review--Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 2010; 36(3): 400-13.
  9. Grossman I, Abu el NA, Peled M. Root-end filling materials in apicoectomy-a review. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993) 2003; 20(2): 49-54, 80.
  10. Hohenfeldt PR, Aurelio JA, Gerstein H. Electrochemical corrosion in the failure of apical amalgam. Report of two cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 60(6): 658-60.
  11. Dorn SO, Gartner AH. Retrograde filling materials: a retrospective success-failure study of amalgam, EBA, and IRM. J Endod 1990; 16(8): 391-3.
  12. Peterson J, Gutmann JL. The outcome of endodontic resurgery: A systematic review. Int Endod J 2001; 34(3): 169-75.
  13. Gagliani MM, Gorni FG, Strohmenger L. Periapical resurgery versus periapical surgery: A 5-year longitudinal comparison. Int Endod J 2005; 38(5): 320-7.
  14. Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR, McKendry DJ, Abedi HR, Miller DA, Kariyawasam SP. Histologic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling in monkeys. J Endod 1997; 23(4): 225-8.
  15. Yaltirik M, Ozbas H, Bilgic B, Issever H. Reactions of connective tissue to mineral trioxide aggregate and amalgam. J Endod 2004; 30(2): 95-9.
  16. Rud J, Andreasen JO, Jensen JE. A follow-up study of 1,000 cases treated by endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1972; 1(4): 215-28.
  17. Andreasen JO, Pitt Ford TR. A radiographic study of the effect of various retrograde fillings on periapical healing after replantation. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994; 10(6): 276-81.
  18. Siqueira JF. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: Why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34(1): 1-10.
  19. Moodnik RM, Levey MH, Besen MA, Borden BG. Retrograde amalgam filling: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 1975; 1(1): 28-31.
  20. Schwartz-Arad D, Yarom N, Lustig JP, Kaffe I. A retrospective radiographic study of root-end surgery with amalgam and intermediate restorative material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96(4): 472-7.
  21. Soares JA, Nunes E, Silveira FF, Santos SM, Oliveira MT. Endodontic re-treatment associated with the elimination of amalgam root-end filling through sinus tracts: a report of two cases. Aust Endod J 2009; 35(2): 59-64.
  22. Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: A review. J Endod 2006; 32(7): 601-23.
  23. Damas BA, Wheater MA, Bringas JS, Hoen MM. Cytotoxicity comparison of mineral trioxide aggregates and EndoSequence bioceramic root repair materials. J Endod 2011; 37(3): 372-5.
  24. Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25(3): 197-205.
  25. Molven O, Halse A, Grung B. Surgical management of endodontic failures: Indications and treatment results. Int Dent J 1991; 41(1): 33-42.
  26. von Arx T, Penarrocha M, Jensen S. Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: a meta-analysis. J Endod 2010; 36(6): 957-73.
  27. Kvist T, Reit C. Results of endodontic retreatment: a randomized clinical study comparing surgical and nonsurgical procedures. J Endod 1999; 25(12): 814-7.
  28. Zuolo ML, Ferreira MO, Gutmann JL. Prognosis in periradicular surgery: A clinical prospective study. Int Endod J 2000; 33(2): 91-8.
  29. Frank AL, Glick DH, Patterson SS, Weine FS. Long-term evaluation of surgically placed amalgam fillings. J Endod 1992; 18(8): 391-8.