The efficacy of different immersion times in chlorhexidine for reducing the Lactobacillus acidophilus contamination of the toothbrush

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

3 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

4 Oral and Maxillofacial Specialist, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

5 Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Lactobacillus acidophilus is involved in plaque formation and progression of caries, and studies show that it can be transmitted through the toothbrush. Thus, decontamination the toothbrush is necessary for oral health. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different immersion times in chlorhexidine (CHX) for reducing the L. acidophilus contamination of the toothbrush.
Methods: This experimental study was conducted on 84 dental students. Primary saliva samples were obtained from the students, and the salivary count of L. acidophilus was measured. The students were assigned to four groups, and the groups were standardized in terms of primary salivary L. acidophilus count: (I) simple rinse of toothbrush with water, (II) simple rinse of toothbrush with CHX, (III) immersion of toothbrush in CHX for 10 minutes, and (IV) immersion of toothbrush in CHX for 24 hours after use. Saliva samples were collected again from the dental students after 3 weeks of practice. The mean L. acidophilus colony counts of primary and secondary saliva samples were calculated. Also, the mean L. acidophilus colony counts of toothbrushes were compared among the four groups. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. The level of significance was set at 0.05.
Results: The mean L. acidophilus colony count of toothbrushes was significantly different between the four groups (P < 0.05). Groups 3 (P = 0.040) and 4 (P = 0.012) showed significantly lower toothbrush microbial count compared with Group 1. No significant difference was noted in the salivary colony count of the four groups after the intervention (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Immersion of toothbrush in CHX for 24 hours and 10 minutes was more effective than other methods for the reduction of L. acidophilus count of the toothbrush. In order to prevent corrosion of bristles, 10 minutes of immersion is recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. Terai T, Okumura T, Imai S, Nakao M, Yamaji K, Ito M, et al. Screening of probiotic candidates in human oral bacteria for the prevention of dental disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128657. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128657.
  2. Addy M, Moran JM. Clinical indications for the use of chemical adjuncts to plaque control: chlorhexidine formulations. Periodontol 2000. 1997;15:52-4. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00104.x.
  3. Broadbent JM, Thomson WM, Boyens JV, Poulton R. Dental plaque and oral health during the first 32 years of life. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(4):415-26. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0197.
  4. Jansiriwattana W, Teparat-Burana T. Laboratory investigation comparing plaque removal efficacy of two novel-design toothbrushes with different brushing techniques. Dent J (Basel). 2018;6(2):8. doi:10.3390/dj6020008.
  5. Evans A, Leishman SJ, Walsh LJ, Seow WK. Inhibitory effects of antiseptic mouthrinses on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Aust Dent J. 2015;60(2):247-54. doi: 10.1111/adj.12312.
  6. Chatterjee A, Debnath K, Rao NKH. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of curcumin and chlorhexidine mouthrinses on clinical inflammatory parameters of gingivitis: a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017;21(2):132-7. doi:10.4103/jisp.jisp_136_17.
  7. Zhang J, Ab Malik N, McGrath C, Lam O. The effect of antiseptic oral sprays on dental plaque and gingival inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2019;17(1):16-26. doi:10.1111/idh.12331.
  8. Lynch MC, Cortelli SC, McGuire JA, Zhang J, Ricci-Nittel D, Mordas CJ, et al. The effects of essential oil mouthrinses with or without alcohol on plaque and gingivitis: a randomized controlled clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):6. doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0454-6.
  9. Raiyani CM, Arora R, Bhayya DP, Dogra S, Katageri AA, Singh V. Assessment of microbial contamination on twice a day used toothbrush head after 1-month and 3 months: an in vitro study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(Suppl 1):S44-8. doi:10.4103/0976-9668.166072.
  10. Bertolini PF, Biondi Filho O, Pomilio A, Pinheiro SL, Carvalho MS. Antimicrobial capacity of Aloe vera and propolis dentifrice against Streptococcus mutans strains in toothbrushes: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(1):32-7. doi:10.1590/s1678-77572012000100007.
  11. Nelson-Filho P, Pereira MS, De Rossi A, da Silva RA, de Mesquita KS, de Queiroz AM, et al. Children’s toothbrush contamination in day-care centers: how to solve this problem? Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(8):1969-74. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1169-y.
  12. Basman A, Peker I, Akca G, Alkurt MT, Sarikir C, Celik I. Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30:S1806-83242016000100203. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0006.
  13. Rodrigues LK, Motter CW, Pegoraro DA, Menoli AP, Menolli RA. Microbiological contamination of toothbrushes and identification of a decontamination protocol using chlorhexidine spray. Rev Odonto Cienc. 2012;27(3):213-7. doi:10.1590/s1980-65232012000300007.
  14. Cole P, Rodu B, Mathisen A. Alcohol-containing mouthwash and oropharyngeal cancer: a review of the epidemiology. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(8):1079-87. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0322.
  15. Chitsazi M, Shirmohammadi A, Balayi E. Effect of herbal and chemical mouth-rinses on periodontal indices; comparison of matrica, persica and chlorhexidine. J Dent. 2007;8(4):54-60.
  16. ten Cate JM. The need for antibacterial approaches to improve caries control. Adv Dent Res. 2009;21(1):8-12. doi:10.1177/0895937409335591.
  17. Ennibi O, Lakhdar L, Bouziane A, Bensouda Y, Abouqal R. Chlorhexidine alcohol base mouthrinse versus chlorhexidine formaldehyde base mouthrinse efficacy on plaque control: double blind, randomized clinical trials. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(1):e135-9. doi:10.4317/medoral.17863.
  18. Efstratiou M, Papaioannou W, Nakou M, Ktenas E, Vrotsos IA, Panis V. Contamination of a toothbrush with antibacterial properties by oral microorganisms. J Dent. 2007;35(4):331-7. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2006.10.007.
  19. Nascimento AP, Faria G, Watanabe E, Ito IY. Efficacy of mouthrinse spray in inhibiting cariogenic biofilm formation on toothbrush bristles. Braz J Oral Sci. 2008;7(24):1489-92.
  20. Söderling EM. Xylitol, mutans streptococci, and dental plaque. Adv Dent Res. 2009;21(1):74-8. doi:10.1177/0895937409335642.
  21. Matthijs S, Adriaens PA. Chlorhexidine varnishes: a review. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(1):1-8. doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290101.x.
  22. Pasquantonio G, Greco C, Prenna M, Ripa C, Vitali LA, Petrelli D, et al. Antibacterial activity and anti-biofilm effect of chitosan against strains of Streptococcus mutans isolated in dental plaque. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2008;21(4):993-7. doi:10.1177/039463200802100424.
  23. Tomás I, Alvarez M, Limeres J, Tomás M, Medina J, Otero JL, et al. Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthwash on the risk of postextraction bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(5):577-82. doi:10.1086/516663.
  24. Kozai K, Iwai T, Miura K. Residual contamination of toothbrushes by microorganisms. ASDC J Dent Child. 1989;56(3):201-4.
  25. Thamke MV, Beldar A, Thakkar P, Murkute S, Ranmare V, Hudwekar A. Comparison of bacterial contamination and antibacterial efficacy in bristles of charcoal toothbrushes versus noncharcoal toothbrushes: a microbiological study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(3):463-7. doi:10.4103/ccd.ccd_309_18.
  26. Shah S, Kunte S, Jagtap C, Jajoo S, Patel A, Shah P. Efficacy of two different mouth rinses in inhibition of the growth of Streptococcus mutans on toothbrush bristles. J Dent Res Rev. 2021;8(4):261-6. doi:10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_123_21.
  27. Nanjunda Swamy KV, Madihalli AU, Prashanth MB. Evaluation of Streptococcus mutans contamination of tooth brushes and their decontamination using various disinfectants-an in vitro study. J Adv Oral Res. 2011;2(3):23-30. doi:10.1177/2229411220110318.
  28. Guruprasath P, Ravishankar PL, Prem Blaisie Rajula M, Sunanda Rao K, Vangipuram P, Visithiriyan G. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine, Listerine, and herbal mouthwashes in decontamination of toothbrushes-an invitro study. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2020;11(4):7366-9. doi:10.26452/ijrps.v11i4.4597.
  29. do Nascimento C, Sorgini MB, Pita MS, Fernandes FH, Calefi PL, Watanabe E, et al. Effectiveness of three antimicrobial mouthrinses on the disinfection of toothbrushes stored in closed containers: a randomized clinical investigation by DNA Checkerboard and Culture. Gerodontology. 2014;31(3):227-36. doi:10.1111/ger.12035.
  30. Anand PJ, Athira S, Chandramohan S, Ranjith K, Raj VV, Manjula VD. Comparison of efficacy of herbal disinfectants with chlorhexidine mouthwash on decontamination of toothbrushes: an experimental trial. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(1):22-7. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.175406.
  31. Agrawal SK, Dahal S, Bhumika TV, Nair NS. Evaluating sanitization of toothbrushes using various decontamination methods: a meta-analysis. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019;16(41):364-71. doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v16i41.1198.
  32. Talaat DM, Sharaf AAE, Ghoneim MAE, El-Shazly SA, El Meligy O. Efficacy of two mouth rinse sprays in inhibiting Streptococcus mutans growth on toothbrush bristles. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30(4):365-72. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.005.
  33. Ribeiro LG, Hashizume LN, Maltz M. The effect of different formulations of chlorhexidine in reducing levels of mutans streptococci in the oral cavity: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent. 2007;35(5):359-70. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.007.
  34. Attin R, Tuna A, Attin T, Brunner E, Noack MJ. Efficacy of differently concentrated chlorhexidine varnishes in decreasing mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts. Arch Oral Biol. 2003;48(7):503-9. doi:10.1016/s0003-9969(03)00093-1.
  35. Gerardu VA, Buijs MJ, ten Cate JM, van Loveren C. The effect of a single application of 40% chlorhexidine varnish on the numbers of salivary mutans streptococci and acidogenicity of dental plaque. Caries Res. 2003;37(5):369-73. doi:10.1159/000072170.
  36. Cummins D, Creeth JE. Delivery of antiplaque agents from dentifrices, gels, and mouthwashes. J Dent Res. 1992;71(7):1439-49. doi:10.1177/00220345920710071601.
  37. Filoche SK, Soma K, Sissons CH. Antimicrobial effects of essential oils in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005;20(4):221-5. doi:10.1111/j.1399-302X.2005.00216.x.
Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology
Volume 12, Issue 1
March 2023
Pages 21-26

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 02 February 2022
  • Revise Date: 25 November 2022
  • Accept Date: 30 January 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics