The impact of laminate veneer restoration on oral health-related quality of life: A case series study

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center AND Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center AND Department of Aesthetic and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 PhD Student, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center AND Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center AND Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center AND Department of Oral and Dental Diseases, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

4 Epidemiologist, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center AND Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Laminate veneer restorations exhibit excellent ability to reproduce the natural teeth regarding esthetic and biomechanics. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of laminate veneers on oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL).METHODS: In this case series study, the impact of treatment on OHQol was measured using the standard questionnaire OHIP-14. This tool was applied to 19 patients who visited the private office of restorative and cosmetic specialist before and six months after treatment.RESULTS: The maximum score recorded by Oral Health Impact Profile-14 was 34 before treatment, with 31 after treatment. The average score decreased from 13.1 ± 9.44 (before treatment) to 12 ± 10.6 (after treatment). Comparison of the frequencies of patient’s responses to OHQoL suggested that changes in OHQoL for question number 4 (uncomfortable to eat food) and question number 9 (difficult to relax) were significant, respectively (P = 0.03, P = 0.02) and for question number 10 (feeling embarrassed) were nearly significant (P = 0.07). Nineteen subjects in this study exhibited improvement in OHQoL.CONCLUSION: Esthetic dental treatment using laminate veneers would significantly affect OHQoL enhancement in some aspects.

Keywords

References

  1. Nabavi N. Unacceptable performance in oral health related quality of life assessments in Iran (letter to editor). J Res Dent Sci 2015; 11(4): 181-3.
  2. Navabi N. A Science metric study of Iranian published articles about oral health-related quality of life. J Oral Health Oral Epidemiol 2013; 2(2): 49-55.
  3. Barrios R, Tsakos G, Gil-Montoya JA, Montero J, Bravo M. Association between general and oral health-related quality of life in patients treated for oral cancer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2015; 20(6): e678-e684.
  4. Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients' satisfaction with dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138(6): 805-8.
  5. Kershaw S, Newton JT, Williams DM. The influence of tooth colour on the perceptions of personal characteristics among female dental patients: comparisons of unmodified, decayed and 'whitened' teeth. Br Dent J 2008; 204(5): E9-7.
  6. Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E. Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20(2): 195-200.
  7. Al-Omiri MK, Karasneh JA, Lynch E, Lamey PJ, Clifford TJ. Impacts of missing upper anterior teeth on daily living. Int Dent J 2009; 59(3): 127-32.
  8. Gerritsen AE, Sarita P, Witter DJ, Kreulen CM, Mulder J, Creugers NH. Esthetic perception of missing teeth among a group of Tanzanian adults. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21(2): 169-73.
  9. Makino-Oi A, Ishii Y, Hoshino T, Okubo N, Sugito H, Hosaka Y, et al. Effect of periodontal surgery on oral healthrelated quality of life in patients who have completed initial periodontal therapy. J Periodontal Res 2016; 51(2): 212-20.
  10. Fueki K, Igarashi Y, Maeda Y, Baba K, Koyano K, Sasaki K, et al. Effect of prosthetic restoration on oral healthrelated quality of life in patients with shortened dental arches: a multicentre study. J Oral Rehabil 2015; 42(9): 701-8.
  11. John MT, Slade GD, Szentpetery A, Setz JM. Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17(5): 503-11.
  12. Grossmann AC, Hassel AJ, Schilling O, Lehmann F, Koob A, Rammelsberg P. Treatment with double crown-retained removable partial dentures and oral health-related quality of life in middle- and high-aged patients. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20(6): 576-8.
  13. Feu D, Miguel JA, Celeste RK, Oliveira BH. Effect of orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life. Angle Orthod 2013; 83(5): 892-8.
  14. Sadek H, Salem G. Psychological aspects of orthognathic surgery and its effect on quality of life in Egyptian patients. East Mediterr Health J 2007; 13(1): 150-9.
  15. Abreu LG, Melgaco CA, Lages EM, Abreu MH, Paiva SM. Effect of year one orthodontic treatment on the quality of life of adolescents, assessed by the short form of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014; 15(6): 435-41.
  16. Emami E, Nguyen PT, Almeida FR, Feine JS, Karp I, Lavigne G, et al. The effect of nocturnal wear of complete dentures on sleep and oral health related quality of life: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 358.
  17. Prajapati P, Sethuraman R, Naveen YG, Patel JR. Indirect laminate veneer: a conservative novel approach. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013.
  18. Korkut B, Yanikoglu F, Gunday M. Direct composite laminate veneers: three case reports. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2013; 7(2): 105-11.
  19. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Broome JC. Summitt's fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. 4th ed. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing Company; 2013. p. 448.
  20. Freedman GA. Contemporary esthetic dentistry lsevieron vital source. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. p. 304-5.
  21. Naito M, Yuasa H, Nomura Y, Nakayama T, Hamajima N, Hanada N. Oral health status and health-related quality of life: a systematic review. J Oral Sci 2006; 48(1): 1-7.
  22. Navabi N, Farnudi H, Rafiei H, Arashlow MT. Orthodontic treatment and the oral health-related quality of life of patients. J Dent (Tehran) 2012; 9(3): 247-54.
  23. Navabi N, Nakhaee N, Mirzadeh A. Validation of a Persian version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14). Iran J Public Health 2010; 39(4): 135-9.
  24. van Eekeren PJ, Aartman IH, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. The effect of implant placement in patients with either Kennedy class II and III on oral health-related quality of life: a prospective clinica trial. J Oral Rehabil 2016; 43(4): 291-6.
  25. da Silva GR, Roscoe MG, Ribeiro CP, da Mota AS, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Impact of rehabilitation with metalceramic
  26. restorations on oral health-related quality of life. Braz Dent J 2012; 23(4): 403-8.
  27. Meireles SS, Goettems ML, Dantas RV, Bona AD, Santos IS, Demarco FF. Changes in oral health related quality of life after dental bleaching in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2014; 42(2): 114-21.
Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology
Volume 5, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
119
August 2016
Pages 134-140

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 July 2016
  • Revise Date: 10 September 2024
  • Accept Date: 12 March 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics