A PRISMA assessment of reporting the quality of published dental systematic reviews in Iran, up to 2017

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center AND Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Dentist, Private Practice, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proper scientific reporting is necessary to ensure correct interpretation of study results by readers. Systematic reviews (SRs) are of critical importance in evidence-based dentistry. This study assessed the reporting quality of published dental SRs in Iran.METHODS: The PubMed and ISI electronic databases were searched to collect published Iranian dental SRs up to the end of 2016. A 17-item checklist, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement, was used to analyze the completeness of SRs reporting.RESULTS: 42 SRs were included in this study. The majority were published in the two fields of endodontics and oral and maxillofacial surgery (38.0%). The mean overall reporting quality score was 18.48 ± 5.03 out of 30 for meta-analyses and 24 for SRs. Inadequate reporting of PICO question (Problem/Patient/Population, Intervention/Indicator, Comparison, Outcome) (73.8%), level of strength (57.1%), and financial supporter (52.4%) were observed.CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the reporting quality of Iranian dental SRs should be further improved.

Keywords

References

  1. Navabi N, Shahravan A, Pourmonajem S, Hashemipour MA. Knowledge and Use of Evidence-based Dentistry among Iranian Dentists. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2014; 14(2): e223-e230.
  2. Navabi N, Shahravan A. The status of evidence-based dentistry in Iran. Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences 2016; 1(1): 1-3.
  3. Habib Agahi R, Navabi N, Shahravan A, Ghassemi A. Critical appraisal of reporting randomized clinical trials published in Iranian dental journals during 2003-2010. J Dent (Tehran) 2014; 11(3): 310-8.
  4. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 1.
  5. Fleming PS, Koletsi D, Pandis N. Blinded by PRISMA: Are systematic reviewers focusing on PRISMA and ignoring other guidelines? PLoS One 2014; 9(5): e96407.
  6. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015; 350: g7647.
  7. Willis BH, Quigley M. The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 163.
  8. Kiriakou J, Pandis N, Fleming PS, Madianos P, Polychronopoulou A. Reporting quality of systematic review abstracts in leading oral implantology journals. J Dent 2013; 41(12): 1181-7.
  9. Elangovan S, Mawardi HH, Karimbux NY. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on short dental implants. J Periodontol 2013; 84(6): 758-67.
  10. Faggion CM Jr, Giannakopoulos NN. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss. J Clin Periodontol 2013; 40(5): 542-52.
  11. Elangovan S, Avila-Ortiz G, Johnson GK, Karimbux N, Allareddy V. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans. J Periodontol 2013; 84(2): 176-85.
  12. Faggion CM Jr, Liu J, Huda F, Atieh M. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. J Periodontal Res 2014; 49(2): 137-42.
  13. Polychronopoulou A. The reporting quality of meta-analysis results of systematic review abstracts in periodontology and implant dentistry is suboptimal. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2014; 14(4): 209-10.
  14. Monje A, Pommer B. The concept of platform switching to preserve peri-implant bone level: Assessment of methodologic quality of systematic reviews. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30(5): 1084-92.
  15. Pidgeon TE, Wellstead G, Sagoo H, Jafree DJ, Fowler AJ, Agha RA. An assessment of the compliance of systematic review articles published in craniofacial surgery with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44(10): 1522-30.
  16. Atieh MA, Duncan WJ, Faggion CM Jr. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on oral implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 31(2): 338-51.
  17. Alarcon MA, Diaz KT, Aranda L, Cafferata EA, Faggion CM Jr, Monje A. Use of biologic agents to promote bone formation in implant dentistry: A critical assessment of systematic reviews. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32(2): 271-81.
  18. Flores-Mir C, Major MP, Major PW. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130(2): 214-7.
  19. Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14(3): 116-37.
  20. Faggion CM Jr, Listl S, Giannakopoulos NN. The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry. Vet J 2012; 192(2): 140-7.
  21. Aziz T, Compton S, Nassar U, Matthews D, Ansari K, Flores-Mir C. Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews. J Oral Rehabil 2013; 40(4): 263-78.
  22. Schmitter M, Sterzenbach G, Faggion CM Jr, Krastl G. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: Methodological assessment using of R-AMSTAR. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17(5): 1287-94.
  23. Kelly JT, Avila-Ortiz G, Allareddy V, Johnson GK, Elangovan S. The association between periodontitis and coronary heart disease: A quality assessment of systematic reviews. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144(4): 371-9.
  24. Fleming PS, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Fedorowicz Z, Pandis N. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 2013; 83(1): 158-63.
  25. Lang LA, Teich ST. A critical appraisal of the systematic review process: Systematic reviews of zirconia single crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111(6): 476-84.
  26. Schiegnitz E, Kammerer P, Al-Nawas B. Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Health Prev Dent 2017; 15(1): 13-21.
  27. Brito JP, Tsapas A, Griebeler ML, Wang Z, Prutsky GJ, Domecq JP, et al. Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66(6): 633-8.
  28. Lang LA, Teich ST. A critical appraisal of evidence-based dentistry: The best available evidence. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111(6): 485-92.
  29. Navabi N, Shahravan A, Modaberi A. Reporting of ethical considerations associated with clinical trials published in Iranian dental journals between 2001 and 2011. Iran J Public Health 2013; 42(6): 594-601.
Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology
Volume 7, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
130
October 2018
Pages 191-197

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 17 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 25 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 12 March 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics