Applying Last-birthday respondent selection method to an oral health telephone survey in an Iranian population

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dental student, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

2 PhD in Biostatistics, Research Fellow and Biostatistician, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

3 Community Oral Health Dept., School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Abstract
Background: A representative sample in health surveys ensures the findings can be reliably generalized to the target population. Conducting oral health surveys through telephone interviews has become more common, and ensuring respondent randomness is necessary for any health survey. Several techniques have been suggested. This paper reports applying the last-birthday method as a within-household random selection method for the first time in an oral health telephone survey in Iran.
Methods: This study was part of a larger research in which adult citizens' self-perceived oral health was compared with an objective dental examination. The last-birthday method randomly selected a household member for each attempted landline number, asking the primary respondent to select an eligible family member with the most recent birthday. The selected respondent was then either contacted or replaced with another respondent from the same household based on the research criteria.
Results: Of the 6745 called numbers, 1771 were invalid, 3129 did not respond, 364 were not households, and 771 declined to be interviewed. Finally, 710 respondents entered the random selection procedure, of which 53 had no eligible family member to select. The sample selection method's difficulty caused 36 refusals. Of the 621 selected final respondents, 30 could not be contacted or refused upon introduction. The total percentage of "selection" and "post-selection” dropouts that could be attributed to the sample selection method was 7.41%. Based on the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR Response Rate 1) guidelines, the minimum response rate for the interview was 13%, and the AAPOR Response Rate 3 was 39.6%. In all characteristics except for employment status (P = 0.488), the final participant's demographic characteristics were significantly different from those of the city population (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Oral health science can make use of the last-birthday selection strategy. This technique seems to obtain a reasonably representative sample through a respondent-friendly selection process in telephone surveys.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Kumar RV. Respondent Selection Methods in Household
Surveys. Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management
Studies, Forthcoming. 2014. Available from: https://ssrn.com/
abstract=2392928.
2. Atchison KA, Matthias RE, Dolan TA, Lubben JE, De Jong
F, Schweitzer SO, et al. Comparison of oral health ratings
by dentists and dentate elders. J Public Health Dent.
1993;53(4):223-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1993.
tb02708.x.
3. Gilbert GH, Duncan RP, Kulley AM. Validity of self-reported
tooth counts during a telephone screening interview. J Public
Health Dent. 1997;57(3):176-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-
7325.1997.tb02970.x.
4. Locker D, Ford J. Using area-based measures of socioeconomic
status in dental health services research. J Public Health
Dent. 1996;56(2):69-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.
tb02399.x.
5. Gaziano C. Comparative analysis of within-household
respondent selection techniques. Public Opin Q.
2005;69(1):124-57. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfi006.
6. Kish L. A procedure for objective respondent selection within
the household. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949;44(247):380-7. doi:
10.1080/01621459.1949.10483314.
7. Bryant BE. Respondent selection in a time of changing
household composition. J Mark Res. 1975;12(2):129-35. doi:
10.1177/002224377501200201.
8. Czaja R, Blair J, Sebestik JP. Respondent selection in a
telephone survey: a comparison of three techniques. J Mark
Res. 1982;19(3):381-5. doi: 10.1177/002224378201900312.
9. Groves RM, Kahn RL. Surveys by Telephone: A National
Comparison with Personal Interviews. Academic Press; 1979.
10. Hagan DE, Collier CM. Must respondent selection
procedures for telephone surveys be invasive? Public Opin Q.
1983;47(4):547-56. doi: 10.1086/268811.
11. Paisley WJ, Parker EB. A computer-generated sampling table
for selecting respondents within households. Public Opin Q.
1965;29(3):431-6.
12. Troldahl VC, Carter RE. Random Selection of Respondents
within Households in Phone Surveys. J Mark Res.
1964;1(2):71-6. doi: 10.1177/002224376400100212.
13. Salmon CT, Nichols JS. The next-birthday method of
respondent selection. Public Opin Q. 1983;47(2):270-6. doi:
10.1086/268785.
14. Binson D, Canchola JA, Catania JA. Random selection
in a national telephone survey: a comparison of the
Kish, next-birthday, and last-birthday methods. J Off Stat.
2000;16(1):53-60.
15. O’Rourke D, Blair J. Improving random respondent selection
in telephone surveys. J Mark Res. 1983;20(4):428-32. doi:
10.1177/002224378302000409.
16. Lind K, Link M, Oldendick R. A Comparison of the Accuracy
of the Last Birthday Versus the Next Birthday Methods for
Random Selection of Household Respondents. http://www.
asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/2000_151.pdf.
17. Lupu N, Montalvo JD, Seligson MA, Zechmeister EJ, Zhirkov
K. Comparing Methods for Sampling Individuals within
Households: A Field Experiment in Costa Rica. 2021. https://
www.noamlupu.com/FM_vs_LB.pdf.
18. Yan T. A Meta-Analysis of Within-Household Respondent
Selection Methods. American Association for Public Opinion
Research (AAPOR); 2009. p. 6134-46.
19. Ghorbani Z, Ebn Ahmady A, Ghasemi E, Zwi AB.
Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health among adults in
Tehran, Iran. Community Dent Health. 2015;32(1):26-31.
20. Statistical Center of Iran (SCI). Population and Housing
Censuses - Census 2016. Available from: https://www.amar.
org.ir/english/Population-and-Housing-Censuses.
21. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR).
Survey Outcome Rate Calculator 4.1. AAPOR; 2020.
22. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR).
Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and
Outcome Rates for Surveys. 9th ed. AAPOR; 2016.
Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology
Volume 13, Issue 1
March 2024
Pages 25-30

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 September 2023
  • Revise Date: 02 March 2024
  • Accept Date: 30 January 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics